.png)
Bangladesh textile manufacturers are absorbing immediate 19% input cost increases on export contracts signed months ago with no mechanism to pass through the price inflation — a margin squeeze that could force production halts or contract defaults. Shams Mahmud, managing director of Shasha Denim, said petroleum-based input costs have risen by around 10% to 15%, while some chemicals have seen far steeper increases. "All yarn and raw material prices are going up -- not only polyester and nylon," said Navidul Huq, managing director of Mohammadi Group, while lyocell fibre — a cellulosic textile fibre made from wood pulp — has jumped from $1.60/kg to $1.90/kg (about 19%) according to industry reports. The problem: these manufacturers locked into dollar-denominated export prices three to six months ago when input costs were 19% lower. On a standard 50,000-tonne textile export order worth $150 million, that 19% input cost increase translates to a $4.75 million margin erosion with no contractual recourse.
The margin crisis stems from two concurrent supply disruptions: fertilizer shortages driving up agricultural feedstock costs, and the Strait of Hormuz remaining largely closed since the conflict began as tensions between the US and Iran intensify. The benchmark price of urea, the most widely traded fertilizer, is up about 30 percent in the last month. In just over a month, urea prices—the lifeblood of modern nitrogen fertilizer—have skyrocketed from $500 to over $650 per metric ton as global granular urea prices jumped nearly 30% in just two weeks following the initial maritime blockades. This fertilizer price surge flows directly into textile production costs through multiple pathways: cotton production requires nitrogen fertilizer, synthetic fiber manufacturing depends on petrochemical feedstocks, and fabric processing chemicals like sulphuric acid have seen dramatic price increases. Sulphuric acid, used in fabric processing, has jumped significantly according to industry reports.
The physical supply chain disruption is creating a financing squeeze across the textile trade. Banks have failed to supply adequate dollars in many cases and have delayed opening letters of credit, traders said. Letters of credit (LC) — bank guarantees that payment will be made once shipping documents are presented — are the primary instrument enabling international textile trade. When LC availability contracts, manufacturers face a financing bottleneck: they cannot secure payment guarantees for new orders while simultaneously absorbing cost increases on existing contracts. Roughly 21 million barrels of crude oil pass daily through the Strait of Hormuz, and the closure has pushed Brent crude futures to trade near $96 per barrel as of mid-April 2026, compared to approximately $60-70 earlier this year. This oil price increase directly feeds into transportation costs, synthetic fiber production, and chemical processing — all core components of textile manufacturing cost structures.
On the buy side, international textile buyers are delaying new orders and demanding price concessions despite the input cost inflation. Export earnings in March dropping by nearly 18 percent compared with the same period last year reflects buyers' reluctance to absorb higher costs in an already weakened demand environment. European and US buyers — Bangladesh's largest textile export markets — face their own inflation pressures and are pushing textile suppliers to absorb the cost increases. Many thought that the conflict would stop in a week or two...But this time, the situation is different and buyers are taking precautions. The result is a double squeeze: manufacturers cannot raise prices to buyers while input costs surge 19% above contracted levels. For a mid-sized textile manufacturer producing 5,000 tonnes monthly at $3,000/tonne contracted price, the 19% input cost increase means absorbing $285,000 monthly in unrecovered costs.
On the sell side, Bangladesh textile exporters are finding themselves trapped between contractual obligations and operational reality. "Some of my apparel consignments are currently stuck at Dhaka airport. They were scheduled to be flown to the UK as air cargo via Dubai. However, with Dubai airport operations suspended, we are in a difficult position." Aviation disruptions have cancelled over 50,000 flights since February 2026, contracting airfreight capacity by more than 10% and creating logistics bottlenecks. Alternative routing through Delhi or other hubs adds 3-5 days transit time and increases freight costs by $200-400 per tonne, further compressing already negative margins. Airlines suspended most flights to Middle Eastern countries following regional airspace closures, leaving the consignment stranded. The vegetables eventually spoiled, causing losses of around $1,200. While this example pertains to agricultural exports, the same routing challenges affect time-sensitive textile shipments.
For large integrated textile conglomerates with diversified supply chains and derivatives access, the crisis creates hedging opportunities alongside operational challenges. Companies like Mohammadi Group or Beximco Textiles — with annual revenues exceeding $500 million — can use commodity swaps to hedge cotton and polyester input costs, and forward freight agreements (FFAs) to lock in shipping rates. They also maintain supplier relationships across multiple countries, enabling supply chain diversification when Gulf suppliers face disruptions. A large producer might hedge 60-70% of their six-month forward input exposure using New York Cotton No. 2 futures and crude oil derivatives, limiting their unhedged exposure to the 19% cost spike. However, even these larger operators face margin compression on pre-signed export contracts and working capital strain as input cost increases require immediate cash while export receivables remain fixed.
For smaller and regional textile operators — mid-sized spinning mills, independent garment factories, or family-owned textile businesses with annual revenues under $50 million — the crisis presents fewer hedging options but more direct operational impact. These operators typically lack access to commodity derivatives markets and depend on spot purchases for inputs like cotton, polyester chips, and chemicals. Without hedging instruments, they absorb the full 19% input cost increase with no downside protection. Their working capital constraints also limit their ability to stockpile inputs during price dips. Due to the shortage of fuel oil, the generators of the country's readymade garment factories are not running, production is being disrupted. As a result, there is uncertainty in the supply of goods to the buyers at the scheduled time. Many smaller operators rely on diesel generators for backup power, and diesel reserves had fallen to just nine days of supply by early March 2026.
Traders and intermediaries in the textile supply chain are finding margin concentration in areas with supply-demand imbalances. Freight forwarders and logistics intermediaries benefit from capacity scarcity as airlines cancel routes and shipping lines avoid Gulf ports. Air cargo rates from Dhaka to European destinations have increased 35-50% as routing shifts from Dubai/Doha hubs to Delhi, Mumbai, or Singapore alternatives. Chemical and fiber traders with inventory positioned outside the Gulf region capture premium pricing as buyers seek non-Middle Eastern suppliers. Cotton traders in India, Brazil, and the US see increased demand from Bangladesh buyers seeking to reduce Gulf supply chain exposure, though this geographic diversification adds 10-15 days to normal lead times. However, traditional textile trading houses face working capital strain as their inventory turns more slowly due to production disruptions and payment delays.
The current crisis echoes the 2022 Ukraine conflict's impact on global commodity flows, but with different geographic concentration. During 2022, fertilizer prices peaked above $800/tonne for urea as Russian and Belarusian exports faced sanctions and supply disruptions. The benchmark price of urea, the most widely traded fertilizer, is up about 30 percent in the last month. The 2026 Middle East crisis affects different supply routes — primarily maritime chokepoints rather than land-based pipelines — but creates similar inflationary pressure through the global fertilizer trade. Bangladesh's textile industry, with its dependence on cotton (fertilizer-intensive) and synthetic fibers (petrochemical-based), faces dual exposure that didn't exist during the 2022 disruptions. The key difference: in 2022, textile manufacturers could adjust export pricing as the crisis developed over months. In 2026, the disruption occurred faster, trapping manufacturers in fixed-price contracts.
Monitoring the textile supply crisis requires tracking specific, time-bound indicators. The Chittagong Container Port — Bangladesh's primary export gateway — handles approximately 60% of the country's textile exports. Weekly container throughput data, published every Thursday by Chittagong Port Authority, provides real-time visibility into export velocity. A sustained 15-20% decline in textile container volumes signals production curtailments. The Bangladesh Taka (BDT) foreign exchange rate against the USD — currently around 123 BDT/USD — reflects import payment pressure from higher input costs. A move beyond 130 BDT/USD within the next 30 days would indicate severe forex strain. Finally, the New Orleans urea price — currently around $650/tonne — serves as the benchmark for global nitrogen fertilizer costs. A break below $550/tonne signals supply normalization, while a move above $750/tonne would trigger the next wave of agricultural input inflation flowing through to textile feedstock costs.
